Advertiser May Have Claims Against SEO Firm Using Undisclosed Spammy Practices

Advertiser May Have Claims Against SEO Firm Using Undisclosed Spammy Practices

A law firm bought SEO services from an organization called “The Rainmaker Institute.” The relationship didn’t end well. The law firm now says the SEO firm used undisclosed spammy techniques that had a high risk of triggering Google penalties. Allegations…

Dead Sea Scrolls Impersonation Case Convictions Partially Affirmed

Dead Sea Scrolls Impersonation Case Convictions Partially Affirmed

I previously blogged about the Dead Sea Scrolls impersonation and harassment case, involving some rather elaborate schemes implemented by the son of Dead Sea Scrolls scholar Norman Golb. (“Conviction Upheld for Impersonating Dead Sea Scrolls Scholars by Sending Out Emails…

Linking to Defamatory Content Protected by Section 230—Vazquez v. Buhl

Linking to Defamatory Content Protected by Section 230—Vazquez v. Buhl

Teri Buhl posted allegedly defamatory content about Vazquez to the Internet. A CNBC editor linked to that post in an article entitled “The Sex and Money Scandal Rocking Hedge Fund Land.” The CNBC article characterized Buhl as a “veteran financial…

Privacy Claims Based on LinkedIn’s Security Promises Survive Motion to Dismiss

Privacy Claims Based on LinkedIn’s Security Promises Survive Motion to Dismiss

This is a lawsuit filed in the wake of a widely reported data breach at LinkedIn. Plaintiffs alleged benefit-of-the-bargain type claims against LinkedIn, saying LinkedIn failed to live up to its security practices. The first time around, the court rejected…

Yelp Wins Another Section 230 Case--Kimzey v. Yelp

Yelp Wins Another Section 230 Case–Kimzey v. Yelp

This is such an easy case, it could have only been brought pro se. The suit involves two Yelp reviews by a user named “Sarah K.” that were allegedly defamatory and otherwise tortious. The court’s substantive discussion (some citations omitted):…

Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge

Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge

There’s no way to look at what Shawn Sayer did and think that he should not suffer some criminal consequences. After breaking up with his girlfriend of a couple of years (Doe), he engaged in a vicious and ongoing campaign…

California Moving To Protect Consumer Reviews--AB 2365 (Forbes Cross-Post)

California Moving To Protect Consumer Reviews–AB 2365 (Forbes Cross-Post)

Consumer reviews play a critical role in our marketplace today, and existing consumers can have significant influence over prospective consumers. Many businesses have accepted this new competitive reality, but not all. For example, some businesses ask their customers to contractually…

Another Attempt to Scrub Unflattering Posts Fails

Another Attempt to Scrub Unflattering Posts Fails

This is another social media defamation case. (Last week’s edition: Another Questionable IP Lawsuit Over a Derogatory Twitter Account.) Plaintiffs were husband and wife. One of the plaintiffs (Hassan Miah) was involved in a business dispute involving a business he founded…

Keyword Advertising Doesn't Create General Jurisdiction--Rocke v. Pebble Beach

Keyword Advertising Doesn’t Create General Jurisdiction–Rocke v. Pebble Beach

I know, Internet jurisdiction cases are typically blah, but this was more interesting than most. Still, I’ll keep this post brief. The Rockes visited the well-known Pebble Beach Resorts in California. Mrs. Rocke suffered a slip-and-fall there but sued the…

'Flash Sale' Website Defeats Class Action Claim With Mandatory Arbitration Clause--Starke v. Gilt

‘Flash Sale’ Website Defeats Class Action Claim With Mandatory Arbitration Clause–Starke v. Gilt

This is a straightforward ruling, but I liked it because it nicely illustrates what’s happening in the field and the courts right now. Gilt Groupe runs the “flash sale” website Gilt.com. I know some folks love these sites but I’ve…