Supreme Court Upholds TikTok Ban, and Domestic and Foreign Censors Rejoice--TikTok v. Garland

In 2024, Congress enacted, and President Biden signed, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which bans “foreign adversary” ownership of certain types of Internet services. The bill specifically bans Bytedance/TikTok by name. TikTok and its users challenged…

Initial Comments on the Supreme Court's TikTok Ban Opinion--TikTok v. Garland

[A much longer post is forthcoming. A few initial remarks] [Update: the longer post is live, and it includes these remarks and 4,000 other words. I recommend you read that instead of this] The Supreme Court’s ruling will foster more…

Another N.D. Ill. Judge Balks at SAD Scheme Joinder--Zaful v. Schedule A Defendants

Zaful is an online retailer with a trademark that seemingly rhymes with…awful? It claims copyright in 1,800+ product shot photos and says TEMU merchants are infringing those product shots in their listings. (Longtime readers know how I feel about copyright…

Comments on the Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton SCOTUS Oral Arguments on Mandatory Online Age "Verification"

Today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, regarding a Texas law that requires adult-oriented websites to age-authenticate all users–minors and adults alike–before they can enter their “virtual” premises. If this sounds familiar, that’s because…

512(c) Helps Vimeo Defeat the Record Labels. It Only Took 15 Years--Capitol v. Vimeo

This case is a throwback in every way. We rarely see lengthy (this one clocks in at 46 pages), detailed, and philosophical Section 512(c) opinions any more, and we only get this one because of the case’s extreme age. Capitol…

Catching Up on the Heavyweight Scraping Battle Between X and Bright Data (Guest Blog Post)

by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Last year, I wrote about how Elon Musk had inadvertently become web scrapers’ most powerful legal advocate. Not because he wanted to advocate for them. But rather, in seeking to enforce a no-scraping ban in…

Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Against Minnesota's Anti-"Deepfakes" Law--Kohls v. Ellison

“Minnesota Statutes section 609.771 prohibits, under certain circumstances, the dissemination of ‘deepfakes’ with the intent to injure a political candidate or influence the result of an election.” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies…

Copyright Battles Over City Council Videos

As the maxim goes, all politics are local. A corollary is that few political disputes are as nasty or vitrolic as local politics. When local disputes devolve into total warfare, the parties grasp for any legal leverage against their sworn…

2024 Internet Law Year-in-Review

My ranking of the top 10 Internet Law developments of 2024. 10) X/Twitter Embraces Partisan Bias. For years, MAGA has claimed that Internet company employees are liberals and therefore surely moderate content to favor their preferred team (the Democrats) and…

California's "Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act" Is Partially Unconstitutional...But Other Parts Are Green-Lighted--NetChoice v. Bonta

California SB 976, “Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act,” is one of the multitudinous laws that pretextually claim to protect kids online. Like many such laws nowadays, it’s a gish-gallop compendium of online censorship ideas: Age authentication! Parental…