DC Circuit Upholds Airbnb’s TOS–Selden v. Airbnb
Selden sued Airbnb for racial discrimination. Airbnb invoked its arbitration clause. Five years ago, the district court sent the case to arbitration. Selden lost the arbitration because a room in an owner-occupied, single-family residence isn’t a public accommodation (similar to the Roommates.com denouement). Post-arbitration, he appealed the district court’s arbitration ruling. The DC Circuit affirms.
This is Airbnb’s iPhone registration screen at the time:
Selden signed up by connecting with his Facebook account. Airbnb automatically used his Facebook avatar as Selden’s Airbnb avatar, which showed his race. (Airbnb no longer requires a profile photo, in part due to the lessons from cases like this). After a host denied his reservation request, he tried again with fake accounts showing Caucasian profile photos, which were accepted. He shared this story on social media with the “#airbnbwhileblack” hashtag, which went viral.
To bypass the arbitration clause (and the resulting adverse arbitration determination), Selden argued that Airbnb’s TOS wasn’t properly formed. Calling the formation process a “sign-in wrap” (ugh), the court replies simply: “We hold that Selden agreed to arbitrate his claims against Airbnb because he had reasonable notice of the Terms of Service and the arbitration clause therein.” The court explains:
Selden argued that he was confused by the hyperlinks being in red font, not blue. The court replies sharply: “Reasonable notice does not turn on where the hyperlinked text falls on the color wheel; rather we consider whether the text was conspicuous.” The court says it was conspicuous because other links were also in red and the legal policies were properly set off from the rest of the page.
Selden said he was also confused by the three different signup button options and their separation from the legal text. The court replies: “The buttons appeared in close proximity to the notice and on a single screen. A reasonable person would know that, by signing up, he would be agreeing to Airbnb’s terms even if he used his Facebook account to sign up.”
Selden also argued that Airbnb’s sign-up page was ugly. The court replies: “Airbnb’s sign-up screen incorporates a simple, streamlined design that sufficiently draws a user’s attention to its Terms of Service.”
Overall, a nice and unsurprising result for Airbnb. Still, looking at this design, I think Airbnb could easily make some minor tweaks to improve it. Most obviously, adding a second click to agree to the terms would be airtight.
Case citation: Selden v. Airbnb, Inc., 2021 WL 2932203 (D.C. Cir. July 13, 2021)
Related Blog Posts on Airbnb and HomeAway:
* Airbnb Gets Mixed Results in Challenge to Boston’s Anti-Airbnb Law–Airbnb v. Boston
* Ninth Circuit Chunks Another Section 230 Ruling—HomeAway v. Santa Monica (Catch-up Post)
* Fourth Amendment Limits NYC’s Demands for Airbnb Customer Records
* Racial Discrimination Lawsuit Against Airbnb Has the Potential to Change Online Marketplaces–Harrington v. Airbnb
* Challenge to Santa Monica’s “Anti-Airbnb” Law Dismissed–HomeAway v. Santa Monica
* VRBO’s Anti-Fraud Guarantee Doesn’t Support Claim Over Fraudulent Listing–Hiam v. HomeAway
* Airbnb Defeats Race Discrimination Claims–Harrington v. Airbnb
* Section 230 Doesn’t Prevent City Regulation of Short-Term Rental Services (Again)–HomeAway v. Santa Monica
* Airbnb Gets Crucial Section 230 Win Over Unauthorized Subleases–La Park La Brea v. Airbnb
* Section 230 Helps VRBO Defeat Claim Over Fraudulent Listing–Hiam v. HomeAway
* Another Collision of Housing Regulations and Online Innovation–SF Housing Rights Committee v. HomeAway
* Section 230 Ruling Against Airbnb Puts All Online Marketplaces At Risk–Airbnb v. San Francisco
* Court Upholds Airbnb’s Terms of Service–Selden v. Airbnb