Facebook Can Legally Block Pages Without Any Explanation–Sikhs For Justice v. Facebook (Forbes Cross-Post)
For many users, Facebook feels like a utility. Facebook users use Facebook to create new things and expect it to work reliably; users don’t expect Facebook will terminate them capriciously. Thus, when Facebook blocks users’ content, it can be shocking…
Senate Commerce Committee Approves Consumer Review Freedom Act (Forbes Cross-Post)
The Consumer Review Freedom Act (S. 2044) would prevent businesses from contractually restricting their customers from writing online reviews (I call those “anti-review clauses,” but they are also called “gag clauses” and “non-disparagement clauses”). It seems ridiculous that we need…
Another Court Says It’s OK To Link To Defamatory Content–Slozer v. Slattery
Another court has ruled that linking to defamatory content isn’t a defamatory republication of the content. I just blogged on a similar result in Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer. The only twist here is that the person posted the…
No Liability for Linking to Defamatory Content–Life Designs Ranch v. Sommer
The plaintiffs run Life Designs Ranch, a substance abuse aftercare program that the defendant’s son participated in. Unhappy about billing issues, the defendant Sommers threatened Life Designs that “I am willing to get legal with this. Are you? I would…
How Congress Can Protect Online Consumer Reviews (An Assessment of the Consumer Review Freedom Act) (Forbes Cross-Post)
[Note: last Wednesday, I testified on the Consumer Review Freedom Act before the Senate Commerce Committee. My testimony. My complete written submission.] For many Americans, the First Amendment is the alpha and omega of free speech protection. However, the First…
Anti-Employer Chatter On Facebook Protected By NLRA–Triple Play v. NLRB
We previously blogged about this case, which involved employees who were discharged by Triple Play Sports Bar and Grille (the employer) for their Facebook activity: “NLRB Invalidates Employer’s Blogging Policy And Reverses Firing Based On Facebook Posts“. On appeal, the…
Another Censorial Copyright Case Results In a Big Fee Shift–Inglewood v. Teixeira
I recently wrote about Katz v. Chevaldina, where a real estate tycoon didn’t like a candid photo taken of him, so he bought the copyrights to the photo and sued a blogger to suppress the photo. The courts had no…
Why Attorneys Dislike Consumer Reviews (Reviewing an Article by Cassandra Burke Robertson)
I recently read an article by Prof. Cassandra Burke Robertson (Case Law) entitled “Online Reputation Management in Attorney Regulation.” This article discusses two of my favorite topics: (1) why do professional service providers struggle with online reviews more than other…
Threatening to Post Sex Video to Facebook Isn’t a True Threat
Two post-Elonis cases show divergent approaches to true threat and harassment jurisprudence. Harrell v. State (Georgia): Harrell was charged and convicted of attempting to intimidating a court officer and animal cruelty. Apparently, he was charged with some violations as a…
University Cannot Discipline Student for Off-Campus Tweets
Yeasin was involved in a relationship with W while both were University of Kansas students. In June 2013, Yeasin drove W to see her therapist and while she was in the session, read (and became incensed by) Facebook messages W…