SPEECH Act Defendant Gets $48,000 In Attorneys’ Fees–Trout Point Lodge Ltd. v. Handshoe
The SPEECH Act requires a fee-shift to successful defendants except in “exceptional circumstances.” The Nova Scotia plaintiffs argued there were exceptional circumstances because Handshoe’s blogged comments were “intentionally offensive,” “derogatory,” “mean-spirited” and reprehensible. The court rejects the arguments:
If Congress intended courts to consider the nature of published statements when determining whether to award attorney’s fees under the SPEECH Act, this case would likely warrant a departure from its fee-shifting rule. However, Plaintiffs have not presented any evidence that Congress intended to preclude the award of attorney’s fees based on the type of speech at issue. Thus, despite the vulgar nature of Handshoe’s rhetoric, the Court does not find that this case presents exceptional circumstances to warrant a departure from the Act’s mandate that the prevailing party receive a reasonable attorney’s fee.
As a result, Handshoe gets an attorneys’ fee award of $48,000 (reduced about $7,000 from the fee request, a pretty small haircut as those things go). Another reminder of the power of the SPEECH Act.
Case citation: Trout Point Lodge Ltd. v. Handshoe, 2013 WL 6524650 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 11, 2013)
Pingback: 9th Circuit Issues a Blogger-Friendly First Amendment Opinion–Obsidian Finance v. Cox | Technology & Marketing Law Blog()