Rounding Up Recent Copyright and AI Rulings

Rounding Up Recent Copyright and AI Rulings

It’s been a busy two weeks for copyright and AI cases. Thaler v. Perlmutter, No. 23-5233 (D.C. Cir. March 18, 2025) This case involved the completely AI-generated work, “A Recent Entrance to Paradise”: The copyright applicant, Thaler, disclaimed any human…

Are You Ready for MAGA to Weaponize Anti-Doxxing Statutes?--Watts v. Daily Kos

Are You Ready for MAGA to Weaponize Anti-Doxxing Statutes?–Watts v. Daily Kos

Wikipedia describes Anthony Watts as “a climate change denial blogger” who “opposes the scientific consensus on climate change.” The Daily Kos published an article about Watts, “Heartland Fundraising For Tony Watts’ $2,000 Thermometers To Compete With Global Temp Network,” that…

First Amendment Doesn't Apply to Descriptions of Content Moderation Practices--Bride v. Snap

First Amendment Doesn’t Apply to Descriptions of Content Moderation Practices–Bride v. Snap

Last year, the Ninth Circuit said that plaintiffs could get around Section 230 in their lawsuit against the app maker YOLO because the app maker said it would ban users for inappropriate statements and would unmask harassers. This opinion raised…

Amazon Isn't Liable for Marketplace Items That Make False Claims--Planet Green v. Amazon

Amazon Isn’t Liable for Marketplace Items That Make False Claims–Planet Green v. Amazon

I previously summarized this lawsuit: The plaintiff sells remanufactured printer ink cartridges. The plaintiff claims that Amazon listings falsely claim that other merchants’ cartridges are “remanufactured” or “recycled.” For reasons unclear to me, the plaintiff thought it would be a…

California's Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Is Completely Unconstitutional (Multiple Ways)--NetChoice v. Bonta

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Is Completely Unconstitutional (Multiple Ways)–NetChoice v. Bonta

I don’t normally start my blog posts with a meme, but this one tells you everything you need to know: * * * This blog post concerns the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC), passed by the California legislature in 2022….

Section 230 Protects Facebook's Decision to Cut Off Sketchy App's API Access--Six4Three v. Facebook

Section 230 Protects Facebook’s Decision to Cut Off Sketchy App’s API Access–Six4Three v. Facebook

Six4Three developed an app called “Pikinis” (a/k/a “Pikini”), which enabled its users to search Facebook for photos of women in bikinis. 🙄 The app drew upon Facebook’s Graph API. Facebook later shut down Six4Three’s API access for what seemed to…

Verizon and Its Cloud Vendor Must Face Lawsuit for Reporting “CSAM” That Wasn’t - Lawshe v. Verizon (Guest Blog Post)

Verizon and Its Cloud Vendor Must Face Lawsuit for Reporting “CSAM” That Wasn’t – Lawshe v. Verizon (Guest Blog Post)

by guest blogger Riana Pfefferkorn Child sex abuse material, or CSAM, is a longstanding scourge on the Internet. Like the baseball diamond in “Field of Dreams,” if you build a service that allows file transmission or storage, someone will come…

Section 230 Still Applies to Email Forwarding--Motekaitis v. USI

Section 230 Still Applies to Email Forwarding–Motekaitis v. USI

Motekaitis and Kneass worked for USI. There were rumors about the circumstances of their departure. Marsh & McLennan (MMA) was contemplating hiring Motekaitis, but then an email from a USI employee (Kane) about Motekaitis spooked MMA. MMA employees allegedly circulated…

Section 230 Doesn't Apply to "Refer-a-Friend" Text Message--Jensen v. Capital One

Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to “Refer-a-Friend” Text Message–Jensen v. Capital One

Capital One has a “refer-a-friend” program for its customers. Capital One provides its customers with promotional content and a customer-specific referral URL. Customers can edit the content as they see fit, then send it to their friends (or their enemies…

Court Rejects an Attempt to Create a Common-Law Notice-and-Takedown Scheme--Bogard v. TikTok

Court Rejects an Attempt to Create a Common-Law Notice-and-Takedown Scheme–Bogard v. TikTok

The plaintiffs allege they notified YouTube and TikTok about videos that allegedly violated the services’ rules, and the services didn’t take action on those notifications despite making various promises to do so. These arguments revisit well-trodden legal ground, but the…