Local Hosting and the Draft “Trade in Services Agreement” (Guest Blog Post)

Local Hosting and the Draft “Trade in Services Agreement” (Guest Blog Post)

by Guest Blogger Marketa Trimble The leaked draft of the Trade in Services Agreement (“TiSA”) – the agreement that is being negotiated by a number of countries, including the United States – has attracted intense criticism: Glyn Moody on ArsTechnica UK…

9th Circuit Sides With Fair Use in Dancing Baby Takedown Case

9th Circuit Sides With Fair Use in Dancing Baby Takedown Case

The 9th Circuit was shockingly quick in issuing its opinion in the “dancing baby” case. The key holdings in Lenz: a person sending a takedown request under section 512(c) must consider fair use fair use is either not an affirmative…

Another Tough Section 230 Ruling For Ripoff Report--Vision Security v. Xcentric

Another Tough Section 230 Ruling For Ripoff Report–Vision Security v. Xcentric

Maybe Ripoff Report’s luck in court is finally running out. I recently blogged on a bizarre case in Iowa where the court held that Ripoff Report couldn’t claim Section 230 protection for contributions made by a guy named Meade. I…

59 Legal Scholars Sign Letter Supporting SPEAK FREE Act To Create Federal Anti-SLAPP Law (Forbes Cross-Post)

59 Legal Scholars Sign Letter Supporting SPEAK FREE Act To Create Federal Anti-SLAPP Law (Forbes Cross-Post)

The First Amendment plays a crucial role in protecting free speech in our country, but the Constitution only sets a floor, not a ceiling, for what legislatures must do to promote free speech. Legislatures can, and do, go further to…

Court Says Yelp Reviewers Aren't Employees (Forbes Cross-Post)

Court Says Yelp Reviewers Aren’t Employees (Forbes Cross-Post)

Way before sharing economy labor practices fueled presidential candidate soundbites, there have been allegations that users contributing content and services to websites were employees. For example, an employment lawsuit over AOL’s “Community Leader” program from the late 1990s led to…

Big Fee Shift in Unsuccessful Copyright Lawsuit To Suppress Unflattering Photo--Katz v. Chevaldina

Big Fee Shift in Unsuccessful Copyright Lawsuit To Suppress Unflattering Photo–Katz v. Chevaldina

This is the latest update in the long-running case involving a real estate mogul, Raanan Katz, who didn’t like a photo taken of him in public. Katz bought the copyright to the photo and then sued a blogger for republishing…

Backpage Gets Bummer Section 230 Ruling in Washington Supreme Court--J.S. v. Village Voice

Backpage Gets Bummer Section 230 Ruling in Washington Supreme Court–J.S. v. Village Voice

I have conflicting feelings about the legal efforts to eliminate online prostitution advertising. I’m aware of the critical role that online advertising can play in human sex trafficking and other associated crimes. However, it’s less clear to me whether shutting…

Teacher Who Blogged Pseudonymously About Students Being “Rat-Like” or “Dunderheads” Loses Appeal

Teacher Who Blogged Pseudonymously About Students Being “Rat-Like” or “Dunderheads” Loses Appeal

This case involved a teacher who maintained a pseudonymous blog that, along with her personal observations and musings, chronicled some of her frustrations with students. One post in particular talked about her challenges with providing tailored feedback for her students,…

The Long-Term Promise of Privacy Federalism, Part 2

The Long-Term Promise of Privacy Federalism, Part 2

Yesterday, guest blogger Bilyana Petkova summarized some of her arguments in favor of “privacy federalism,” i.e., temporary state-level regulation of privacy matters, a topic she addresses more fully in a forthcoming article on SSRN. In helping her prepare her post,…

Sisterly Online Squabbling Isn't Criminal Stalking

Sisterly Online Squabbling Isn’t Criminal Stalking

This is a stalking and harassment case. The complainant’s allegations are below: I observed a photograph of a telephone number and a caption stating, “Found on the street. No.callme # anytakers? # foragoodtime.” posted on Instagram by username “[NAME REMOVED]*,”…