YouTube Defeats Trademark Lawsuit--Lops v. YouTube

YouTube Defeats Trademark Lawsuit–Lops v. YouTube

Leonel Lops claims a trademark in the term “Confidence Empire” for shoes. He alleges that YouTube sold items under the “Confidence Empire” brand and published videos from a dance troupe named Confidence Empire (maybe this one?). He sued YouTube for…

Consumers Don't Think Plant-Based "Milks" Are Cowmilk, But the FDA Wants More Disclosures Anyway

Consumers Don’t Think Plant-Based “Milks” Are Cowmilk, But the FDA Wants More Disclosures Anyway

“The issue is, what is milk?” The FDA uses the term “milk” to describe cowmilk [FN], but that isn’t a single commercial product from a nutritional standpoint–there are various versions of “milk” with different fat percentages, with lactose removed, and…

Ripoff Report Gets a Pricey Lesson on Section 230--Selker v. Xcentric

Ripoff Report Gets a Pricey Lesson on Section 230–Selker v. Xcentric

I’ve blogged many Ripoff Report cases over the years, but it’s been a while since my last one (looks like 2018?). In this case, the plaintiff alleges that someone posted a false attack review; he paid Ripoff Report $2,500 to…

Form "Non-Disparagement" Clause Violated Consumer Review Fairness Act--State v. Ideal Horizon Benefits

Form “Non-Disparagement” Clause Violated Consumer Review Fairness Act–State v. Ideal Horizon Benefits

In 2016, Congress enacted the Consumer Review Fairness Act (CRFA), which bans businesses from trying to contractually restrict their customers’ reviews. It represents a rare federal intervention into contract law, and it does so for good reasons–to reduce the ability…