YouTuber Owes Money to YouTube for Ill-Conceived Deplatforming Lawsuit–Daniels v. Alphabet
…YouTube shadowbanned and demonetized him because of MAGA-ish content. Represented by lawyers Maria Cristina Armenta and Credence Elizabeth Sol (who keep expanding their oeuvre of failed lawsuits against Internet services),…
Government Jawboning Doesn’t Turn Internet Services into State Actors–Doe v. Google
…means they lose. In contrast to many cases in this genre, the plaintiffs were represented by counsel. That counsel is Cris Armenta. In addition to being on the losing side…
Demonetized YouTuber Loses Lawsuit–Daniels v. Alphabet
Daniels is a YouTuber apparently of the #MAGA persuasion. Represented by Maria Cristina Armenta and Credence Elizabeth Sol, best known for litigating an ultimately unsuccessful censorial “Innocence of Muslims” lawsuit…
Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet
…moderation remedies). He sued YouTube for a variety of claims, all of which fail. Personnel note: the plaintiff’s lawyers are Maria Cristina Armenta and Credence Elizabeth Sol, and this isn’t…
QAnon Conspiracy Theorists Can’t Force YouTube to Carry Their Videos–Doe v. Google
…curious about the lawyers willing to represent such unpopular clients. In this case, the plaintiffs’ lead lawyers are Cris Armenta and Credence Sol–the same team that represented the plaintiff in…