Another Anti-Vaxxer Jawboning Lawsuit Fails--ICAN v. YouTube

Another Anti-Vaxxer Jawboning Lawsuit Fails–ICAN v. YouTube

This is another lawsuit by anti-vaxxers. The “Informed Consent Action Network,” and its founder Del Bigtree, ran afoul of the social media services’ COVID misinformation policies. YouTube and Facebook each repeatedly blocked ICAN’s content items before yanking ICAN’s accounts. ICAN…

2021 Section 230 Year-in-Review

2021 Section 230 Year-in-Review

December 2020 ended with Section 230’s existence in jeopardy. Shortly before he insurrected a violent takeover of the U.S. Capitol, lame-duck President Trump demanded Section 230’s repeal. Trump even vetoed raises for our soldiers because Congress didn’t repeal Section 230…

2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review

2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review

This is my annual review of the Internet Law highlights of the prior year. I’ve posted a 2021 year-in-review post for emoji law, and I also posted a separate Section 230 year-in-review. NFTs. Much of the NFT activity right now…

Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena Submitted to YouTube--Watch Tower v. Kevin McFree

Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena Submitted to YouTube–Watch Tower v. Kevin McFree

A “lapsed” Jehovah’s Witnesses member, using the alias “Kevin McFree,” posted YouTube videos using stop-animation of Lego figurines to criticize the Jehovah’s Witnesses. The IP arm of the Jehovah’s Witnesses (the “Watch Tower”) claimed that one such video, the “Dubtown…

Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good)

Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good)

The number #1 question I get whenever I discuss FOSTA with folks who aren’t familiar with it: did Congress know what it was doing? Well, the answer is complicated. Many things have gone wrong with FOSTA, and those outcomes were…

The First Amendment Protects Twitter's Fact-Checking and Account Suspension Decisions--O'Handley v. Padilla

The First Amendment Protects Twitter’s Fact-Checking and Account Suspension Decisions–O’Handley v. Padilla

The plaintiff is Rogan O’Handley, a California lawyer with elite credentials (UChicago Law, practice experience as a corporate finance and entertainment attorney) who nevertheless jumped onto the anti-“elites” Trump train 🙄 and embraced Trump’s Big Lie that the 2020 election…

Section 230 Preempts Claims Against Omegle--M.H. v. Omegle

Section 230 Preempts Claims Against Omegle–M.H. v. Omegle

Omegle enables real-time video and text chats with users assigned at random. The case involves an 11 year old girl who was a first-time Omegle user. The complaint alleges that a malefactor John Doe manipulated her into disrobing so he…

Background Reports Protected by Section 230--Dennis v. MyLife

Background Reports Protected by Section 230–Dennis v. MyLife

Plaintiffs sued MyLife for selling background reports about them and furnishing “public reputation scores.” MyLife aggregates its data from third-party sources, but the plaintiffs “seek to hold Defendant liable for packaging and re-publishing this information on its website without their…

Catching Up on the 11th Circuit Appeal in NetChoice v. Moody Over Florida's Social Media Censorship Law

Catching Up on the 11th Circuit Appeal in NetChoice v. Moody Over Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law

As you recall, earlier this year Florida passed SB 7072, a brazenly censorial #MAGA bill. The district court enjoined the law, and Florida appealed to the 11th Circuit. In my last post, I recapped Florida’s appeal brief and the supporting…

Airbnb Uses Section 230 to Defeat a Personal Injury Claim--Smith v. Airbnb

Airbnb Uses Section 230 to Defeat a Personal Injury Claim–Smith v. Airbnb

I was a little surprised by this ruling. The Ninth Circuit’s HomeAway ruling seemingly eliminated Section 230 for any transactions that Airbnb booked, at least in the Ninth Circuit. Yet, this court finds that Section 230 fully protects Airbnb…amazingly without…