Quick Debrief on the Gonzalez v. Google Oral Arguments

Quick Debrief on the Gonzalez v. Google Oral Arguments

I’m going to crank this blog post out before I get swamped with press requests. My takeaways: I did not hear 5 votes in favor of the plaintiffs’ position. Indeed, the justices didn’t really engage with the plaintiffs’ core arguments…

Preparing for the Supreme Court's Gonzalez v. Google Oral Arguments

Preparing for the Supreme Court’s Gonzalez v. Google Oral Arguments

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Gonzalez v. Google case. I am NOT looking forward to this at all. First, I expect the arguments will go poorly for free speech and the Internet’s status quo. It’ll…

Musk's Changes at Twitter Moot Lawsuit Over Naomi Wolf's Deplatforming--Trump v. Twitter

Musk’s Changes at Twitter Moot Lawsuit Over Naomi Wolf’s Deplatforming–Trump v. Twitter

Wikipedia says: “During the COVID-19 pandemic, [Naomi] Wolf has frequently promoted COVID-19 misinformation, misinformation related to vaccination and 5G conspiracy theories.” Twitter banned her account as part of its COVID misinformation crackdown. Wolf then joined Trump’s “deplatforming” lawsuit against Twitter,…

New York's Mandatory Editorial Transparency Law Preliminarily Enjoined--Volokh v. James

New York’s Mandatory Editorial Transparency Law Preliminarily Enjoined–Volokh v. James

Last year, as part of the first wave of censorial mandatory editorial transparency laws, New York enacted N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law ยง 394-ccc. The “has two main requirements: (1) a mechanism for social media users to file complaints about instances…

A Preliminary Analysis of Trump's Copyright Lawsuit Over Interview Recordings (Trump v. Simon & Schuster) (Guest Blog Post)

A Preliminary Analysis of Trump’s Copyright Lawsuit Over Interview Recordings (Trump v. Simon & Schuster) (Guest Blog Post)

By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa [Eric’s note: Prof. Ochoa calls this a “preliminary” analysis, but that doesn’t mean it’s short!] Two weeks ago, former President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against journalist Bob Woodward and his publisher, Simon & Schuster…

Snapchat Defeats Lawsuit Over User-to-User Harassment--Ziencik v. Snap

Snapchat Defeats Lawsuit Over User-to-User Harassment–Ziencik v. Snap

[I’m backlogged on several 230 cases. I’ll get to them eventually] This case involves two Snapchat users who repeatedly received threatening messages from other Snapchat users despite the victims’ efforts to block the perpetrators. A victim flagged messages for Snapchat,…

Can Government Agencies Ban Scraping?–NAACP v. Kohn (Guest Blog Post)

by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy For years, open-Internet advocates have argued that scraping bans infringe on First Amendment rights. After all, access to information is a protected form of speech. But since most scraping cases involve two private litigants, and…

Domain Name Sniping Covered by Section 230--Scott Rigsby v. GoDaddy

Domain Name Sniping Covered by Section 230–Scott Rigsby v. GoDaddy

It’s refreshing to see a “normal” Section 230 opinion from the Ninth Circuit. They have gotten rarer, and the Gonzalez opinion may make them extinct. Scott Rigsby is the first double-leg amputee to complete an Iron Man Triathlon. He registered…

Section 230 Still Applies to User Reviews--Daniloff v. Google

Section 230 Still Applies to User Reviews–Daniloff v. Google

It’s well-settled law that Section 230 protects review services for tortious user reviews. The Ninth Circuit told us this in 2016 (in Kimzey v. Yelp), but the caselaw was already clear by then. Yet, here we are in 2023, still…

University-Operated Twitter Account is a Limited Public Forum--Gilley v. Stabin

University-Operated Twitter Account is a Limited Public Forum–Gilley v. Stabin

This lawsuit involves the @UOEquity Twitter account, operated by the University of Oregon’s Division of Equity and Inclusion. During the relevant time period, tova stabin (who styles her name in lowercase) was the communications manager running the account. The account…