Defamation Claim Proceeds Against YouTuber's Denialism--Robertson v. Upchurch

Defamation Claim Proceeds Against YouTuber’s Denialism–Robertson v. Upchurch

This case involves Ryan Upchurch, who Wikipedia describes as “an American rapper, singer-songwriter, and comedian.” He has 3M+ followers at YouTube. For unspecified reasons, Upchurch started discussing the tragic and highly publicized disappearance of Kiely Rodni on his YouTube channel….

A Peek Into the Long Tail of Facebook’s Litigation Docket

I’ve retired my old Quick Links format, so instead I’m rounding up a couple of Facebook cases that hit my alerts. Georgia Auto Group LLC v. Meta Platforms Inc., 2024 WL 2260718 (M.D. Ga. May 17, 2024) I’m blogging this…

X Corp. v. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post)

X Corp. v. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post)

by guest blogger Guy Rub, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law A Web Scraper Beats a Platform: The Same Story, but Different It seems like we’ve been here before, and not that long ago. A platform sues a web…

Supreme Court Fixes One Problem with the Copyright Statute of Limitations, But Punts Another — Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy (Guest Blog Post)

Supreme Court Fixes One Problem with the Copyright Statute of Limitations, But Punts Another — Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy (Guest Blog Post)

By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court held 6-3 that assuming a copyright infringement claim is timely under the discovery rule of accrual, meaning that it was filed within three years of the date “when a…

Elon Musk’s Gifts to Web Scrapers (Guest Blog Post)

Elon Musk’s Gifts to Web Scrapers (Guest Blog Post)

By Kieran McCarthy Elon Musk may have done more to open the Internet to web scraping than any person or public interest advocacy group. Not that he meant to do this, mind you. He was trying to do the opposite….

Section 230 Preempts Product Design Claims--Lama v. Meta

Section 230 Preempts Product Design Claims–Lama v. Meta

The court summarizes: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed “to implement a child protective procedure whereby parents, school personnel, and other children[-]responsible persons would be able to protect against online bullying wherein the defendants’ products were foreseeably weaponized to facilitate online…

Supreme Court Addresses When Government Employees' Social Media Accounts are State Action (Lindke & Garnier)

Supreme Court Addresses When Government Employees’ Social Media Accounts are State Action (Lindke & Garnier)

[This post got stuck in my drafts folder…sharing it now for completeness] I see many cases against government employees for posting and moderating content on social media. The topic is a doctrinal morass because many details can affect the analysis….

Plaintiffs Make Some Progress in 512(f) Cases

Plaintiffs Make Some Progress in 512(f) Cases

This post recaps some recent 512(f) cases that have hit my alerts. Surprisingly, all of the decisions involve a positive ruling for the plaintiff, which is different from the typical past outcomes. Maybe the jurisprudential tide is turning? Bungie, Inc….

The 7th Circuit's Section 230 Jurisprudence's Impact on FOSTA Cases

The 7th Circuit’s Section 230 Jurisprudence’s Impact on FOSTA Cases

Last August, in GG v. Salesforce, a split Seventh Circuit panel ruled that Salesforce didn’t qualify for Section 230 in a FOSTA case. I never blogged that opinion for two reasons. First, it came at a busy time (I was…

Trump's Retweets Are Criminal Contempt of a Gag Order--People v. Trump

Trump’s Retweets Are Criminal Contempt of a Gag Order–People v. Trump

As you surely know, the state of New York is prosecuting Donald Trump for allegedly falsifying business records in connection with the hush-payments to Stormy Daniels. The judge overseeing the case is well aware of Trump’s shambolic approach to high-stakes…