Eric Menhart Backs Off CyberLaw Trademark Claim

By Eric Goldman

You may recall that last month we all had a good laugh over self-proclaimed Cyberlawyer Eric Menhart’s trademark application for the term “CyberLaw” to describe his Cyberlaw practice. (In case it wasn’t clear, we weren’t laughing WITH him…). Despite his initial blustery defense of the application (which, as a reader noted to me, violated the First Rule of Holes), Menhart has now backed off his claim to own the term “CyberLaw.” Instead, he has amended his application to seek a trademark registration only in his stylized CyberLaw logo. (Thanks to Tricia Bishop at the Baltimore Sun for calling my attention to the amendment and sending the copy). Unfortunately, I won’t dare display the logo here because it would likely make me his next enforcement target; but you can see the design in the amended application.

With this amendment, I’m inferring that all of us–even Michael Grossman, the victim of Menhart’s efforts to enforce his purported trademark rights in the term “CyberLaw”–are now free to use the term “Cyberlaw” for its dictionary meaning without fear of getting sued by Menhart. However, Menhart doesn’t appear to have changed his tune about the merits of his initial application. Instead, the Baltimore Sun quotes him as saying that he amended his application because:

It was very clear that this was not going to be an academic argument, it was going to be more of a shouting match, and I didn’t think it was worth my time to get involved in a shouting match with people that were going to shout louder and had more ammunition in their holsters than I had

Funny–I would have thought it wasn’t worth his time because the application was completely unmeritorious.

What Eric Menhart might characterize as a “shouting match” is actually online word of mouth in action. (Note: the Baltimore Sun article incorrectly quoted me as saying that the blogosphere “gang-heckled” him. Actually, I said that we “gang-tackled” him, but the imagery of gang-heckling is perhaps nevertheless appropriate). Historically, it has been fairly rare to see bona fide public evaluations of a lawyer by his or her peers; that kind of reputational information was often well known among lawyers practicing in the geographic/doctrinal area and effectively unavailable to everyone else. Now, through the Internet, everyone–including Menhart’s prospective clients–can easily find out what his peers think of Eric Menhart’s choices, enabling this reputational information to have a much greater effect at rewarding or punishing marketplace participants as appropriate.

UPDATE: More coverage of this topic:

* Brett Trout

* Ron Coleman

* Sam Bayard

* Techdirt

Category: Product #: Regular price:$ (Sale ends ) Available from: Condition: Good ! Order now!
Reviewed by on. Rating: