August 25, 2006
Barrett v. Rosenthal Oral Arguments Scheduled for September 5
By Eric Goldman
The California Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments in Barrett v. Rosenthal for September 5 at 2 pm in San Francisco. See the case record here. This case has the potential to define, as binding California precedent and as persuasive precedent elsewhere, whether or not 47 USC 230 preempts "distributor" liability as well as publisher liability. It's very possible that the Supreme Court will sidestep that question to resolve the case on its facts, but if the court does address the distributor v. publisher question, this case could be the most significant 47 USC 230 opinion since Zeran. At minimum, if the court says directly or indirectly that 230 doesn't preempt distributor liability, expect widespread rejoicing among the plaintiff's bar and a slew of new lawsuits against every intermediary that hosts user content.
I am planning to attend the hearing. If anyone else is going, please email me offline. If anyone knows how to get into a Supreme Court hearing, please email me offline.
Posted by Eric at August 25, 2006 03:38 PM | Derivative Liability
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Barrett v. Rosenthal Oral Arguments Scheduled for September 5:
» Cal. Supreme Ct. to hear Section 230 Case Today from Blogs at CIS - Colette Vogele
I'm heading down to hear the oral arguments on the section 230 case,Barrett v. Rosenthal today. Eric Goldman has a good summary of the case and links to key briefs and opinions at his Technology and Marketing Law blog. EFF... [Read More]
Tracked on September 5, 2006 08:34 AM