<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: District Court Ruling Highlights Congress&#8217; Hastiness To Pass &#8216;Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA&#8217;&#8211; Doe 1 v. Backpage	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Goldman		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm#comment-2079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Goldman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18516#comment-2079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm#comment-2062&quot;&gt;Bella Robinson&lt;/a&gt;.

https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-signed-into-law-completing-section-230s-evisceration.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm#comment-2062">Bella Robinson</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-signed-into-law-completing-section-230s-evisceration.htm" rel="ugc">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-signed-into-law-completing-section-230s-evisceration.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: &#8216;Worst of Both Worlds&#8217; FOSTA Signed Into Law, Completing Section 230&#8217;s Evisceration &#8211; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm#comment-2078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8216;Worst of Both Worlds&#8217; FOSTA Signed Into Law, Completing Section 230&#8217;s Evisceration &#8211; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18516#comment-2078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] have held that victims&#8217; claims against Backpage can survive a Section 230 motion to dismiss (Doe 1 v. Backpage; Florida Abolitionists v. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] have held that victims&#8217; claims against Backpage can survive a Section 230 motion to dismiss (Doe 1 v. Backpage; Florida Abolitionists v. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Backpage Loses Another Section 230 Motion (Again Without SESTA/FOSTA)&#8211;Florida Abolitionists v. Backpage &#8211; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm#comment-2068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Backpage Loses Another Section 230 Motion (Again Without SESTA/FOSTA)&#8211;Florida Abolitionists v. Backpage &#8211; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 16:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18516#comment-2068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] purported limitations. Indeed, a week after the Senate passed the Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA, the court partially denied Backpage&#8217;s Section 230 motion to dismiss&#8211;exactly as the opponents had argued. The tiny time gap between the Senate&#8217;s passage and [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] purported limitations. Indeed, a week after the Senate passed the Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA, the court partially denied Backpage&#8217;s Section 230 motion to dismiss&#8211;exactly as the opponents had argued. The tiny time gap between the Senate&#8217;s passage and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Technology &#038; Marketing Law Blog &#8211; District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. Backpage &#8211; NetChoice		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm#comment-2063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technology &#038; Marketing Law Blog &#8211; District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. Backpage &#8211; NetChoice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18516#comment-2063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Technology &#038; Marketing Law Blog - District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog &#8211; District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bella Robinson		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/district-court-ruling-highlights-congress-hastiness-to-pass-worst-of-both-worlds-fosta-doe-1-v-backpage.htm#comment-2062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bella Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18516#comment-2062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr Eric Goldman, I have a question that I hope you could answer for me.
Every day I check to see if Trump has signed Fosta yet

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr1865?utm_campaign=govtrack_email_update&#038;utm_source=govtrack/email_update&#038;utm_medium=email

I was wondering what happens if the president does not sign or veto a bill?

So I started researching, 

Pocket Veto. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Now if I am understanding this right, it looks like they arent back in session again until April 10th, so would this mean if he doesn&#039;t sign it by tomorrow which is 10 days after March 21st when it passed the Senate that it wouldn&#039;t be a law?   or how do we know how long after passing the Senate that they took to send it to the president?  Could it be that he doesn&#039;t have the balls to veto it,  so the plan is to let it die because Congress isn&#039;t in session?  

https://www.house.gov/legislative-activity/2018-04-26

So if it dies and they aren&#039;t in session again Until April 10th, can they get the 2/3 vote from both chambers after April 10th, to allow it to become law. Or does their time run out for that in 10 days too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Eric Goldman, I have a question that I hope you could answer for me.<br />
Every day I check to see if Trump has signed Fosta yet</p>
<p><a href="https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr1865?utm_campaign=govtrack_email_update&#038;utm_source=govtrack/email_update&#038;utm_medium=email" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr1865?utm_campaign=govtrack_email_update&#038;utm_source=govtrack/email_update&#038;utm_medium=email</a></p>
<p>I was wondering what happens if the president does not sign or veto a bill?</p>
<p>So I started researching, </p>
<p>Pocket Veto. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.</p>
<p>Now if I am understanding this right, it looks like they arent back in session again until April 10th, so would this mean if he doesn&#8217;t sign it by tomorrow which is 10 days after March 21st when it passed the Senate that it wouldn&#8217;t be a law?   or how do we know how long after passing the Senate that they took to send it to the president?  Could it be that he doesn&#8217;t have the balls to veto it,  so the plan is to let it die because Congress isn&#8217;t in session?  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.house.gov/legislative-activity/2018-04-26" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.house.gov/legislative-activity/2018-04-26</a></p>
<p>So if it dies and they aren&#8217;t in session again Until April 10th, can they get the 2/3 vote from both chambers after April 10th, to allow it to become law. Or does their time run out for that in 10 days too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
