<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: When is a Man&#8217;s Penis Size a &#8220;Matter of Legitimate Public Concern&#8221;?&#8211;Kalil v. Kalil	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2026/09/when-is-a-mans-penis-size-a-matter-of-legitimate-public-concern-kalil-v-kalil.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2026/09/when-is-a-mans-penis-size-a-matter-of-legitimate-public-concern-kalil-v-kalil.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 06:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Remarks about the size of former husband’s penis ruled a ‘legitimate public concern’ &#124; Evocatively Ambiguous		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2026/09/when-is-a-mans-penis-size-a-matter-of-legitimate-public-concern-kalil-v-kalil.htm#comment-4680</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remarks about the size of former husband’s penis ruled a ‘legitimate public concern’ &#124; Evocatively Ambiguous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 06:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=29269#comment-4680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] On the Technology &#038; Marketing Law Blog: When is a Man’s Penis Size a “Matter of Legitimate Public Concern”?–Kalil v. Kalil [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] On the Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog: When is a Man’s Penis Size a “Matter of Legitimate Public Concern”?–Kalil v. Kalil [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
