<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg: All About That Intrinsic Test? (Guest Blog Post)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2026/09/sedlik-v-von-drachenberg-all-about-that-intrinsic-test-guest-blog-post.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2026/09/sedlik-v-von-drachenberg-all-about-that-intrinsic-test-guest-blog-post.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 14:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg: The Right Way to Evaluate Wrongfulness (Guest Blog Post) - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2026/09/sedlik-v-von-drachenberg-all-about-that-intrinsic-test-guest-blog-post.htm#comment-4683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg: The Right Way to Evaluate Wrongfulness (Guest Blog Post) - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=29296#comment-4683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] we mentioned in our previous post, the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s intrinsic-extrinsic framework for substantial similarity has a number of [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] we mentioned in our previous post, the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s intrinsic-extrinsic framework for substantial similarity has a number of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
