<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Initial Interest Confusion&#8217; Is More of a Vibe Than a Credible Legal Doctrine&#8211;Penn State v. Vintage Brand	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/11/initial-interest-confusion-is-more-of-a-vibe-than-a-credible-legal-doctrine-penn-state-v-vintage-brand.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/11/initial-interest-confusion-is-more-of-a-vibe-than-a-credible-legal-doctrine-penn-state-v-vintage-brand.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 18:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine Refuses to Die - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/11/initial-interest-confusion-is-more-of-a-vibe-than-a-credible-legal-doctrine-penn-state-v-vintage-brand.htm#comment-4505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine Refuses to Die - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=28255#comment-4505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] my recent critical coverage of the initial interest confusion doctrine, here are a few more rulings on the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] my recent critical coverage of the initial interest confusion doctrine, here are a few more rulings on the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
