<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 512(f) Doesn&#8217;t Support Preliminary Injunction&#8211;BViral v. TheSoul	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/09/512f-doesnt-support-preliminary-injunction-bviral-v-thesoul.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/09/512f-doesnt-support-preliminary-injunction-bviral-v-thesoul.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 15:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 512(f) Claim Sent to Trial (Which Didn&#039;t Happen)-Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/09/512f-doesnt-support-preliminary-injunction-bviral-v-thesoul.htm#comment-4492</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[512(f) Claim Sent to Trial (Which Didn&#039;t Happen)-Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=28084#comment-4492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] 512(f) Doesn’t Support Preliminary Injunction–BViral v. TheSoul * In 512(f), the “F” Stands for “Futility”–Shaffer v. Kavarnos * Does Anyone Still Care [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 512(f) Doesn’t Support Preliminary Injunction–BViral v. TheSoul * In 512(f), the “F” Stands for “Futility”–Shaffer v. Kavarnos * Does Anyone Still Care [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
