<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Photos in a Similar Style Aren&#8217;t Copyright-Infringing&#8211;Woodland v. Lil Nas X	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/05/photos-in-a-similar-style-arent-copyright-infringing-woodland-v-lil-nas-x.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/05/photos-in-a-similar-style-arent-copyright-infringing-woodland-v-lil-nas-x.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Goldman		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/05/photos-in-a-similar-style-arent-copyright-infringing-woodland-v-lil-nas-x.htm#comment-4427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Goldman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=27724#comment-4427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/05/photos-in-a-similar-style-arent-copyright-infringing-woodland-v-lil-nas-x.htm#comment-4426&quot;&gt;vah4bm&lt;/a&gt;.

I looked at the photo comparisons in the opinion. I think they spoke for themselves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/05/photos-in-a-similar-style-arent-copyright-infringing-woodland-v-lil-nas-x.htm#comment-4426">vah4bm</a>.</p>
<p>I looked at the photo comparisons in the opinion. I think they spoke for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vah4bm		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/05/photos-in-a-similar-style-arent-copyright-infringing-woodland-v-lil-nas-x.htm#comment-4426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vah4bm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=27724#comment-4426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No offense, Eric, but did you talk to Mr. Woodland...?  No, you didn&#x27;t. You didn&#x27;t even try to hear from him or get his perspective. Of note, his trial attorney failed him in two important aspects -- copyright and access, both of which would have led to a positive decision on discovery from the district judge instead of a denial. Before you pen an article like this, please do your homework before pre-judging a case based on faulty decisions by appellate judges.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense, Eric, but did you talk to Mr. Woodland&#8230;?  No, you didn&#x27;t. You didn&#x27;t even try to hear from him or get his perspective. Of note, his trial attorney failed him in two important aspects &#8212; copyright and access, both of which would have led to a positive decision on discovery from the district judge instead of a denial. Before you pen an article like this, please do your homework before pre-judging a case based on faulty decisions by appellate judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
