Comments on: California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Is Completely Unconstitutional (Multiple Ways)–NetChoice v. Bonta https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/03/californias-age-appropriate-design-code-aadc-is-completely-unconstitutional-multiple-ways-netchoice-v-bonta.htm Sat, 29 Mar 2025 15:20:12 +0000 hourly 1 By: First Amendment Doesn't Apply to Descriptions of Content Moderation Practices-Bride v. Snap - Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/03/californias-age-appropriate-design-code-aadc-is-completely-unconstitutional-multiple-ways-netchoice-v-bonta.htm#comment-4411 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 15:20:12 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=27508#comment-4411 […] also think this result is plainly at odds with the NetChoice v. Bonta ruling, which said that legal obligations for services to enforce their stated policies are subject to […]

]]> By: California AG Abandons Key Parts of California's Mandatory Editorial Transparency Law (AB 587)-X v. Bonta - Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/03/californias-age-appropriate-design-code-aadc-is-completely-unconstitutional-multiple-ways-netchoice-v-bonta.htm#comment-4405 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:14:52 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=27508#comment-4405 […] Among other problems, this definition is riddled with vagueness. What is a “semipublic service” or “semipublic profile”??? The law also makes content-based distinctions about who’s covered (social media with certain attributes vs. other UGC sites). These definitional distinctions should trigger strict scrutiny for the whole law. See NetChoice v. Bonta. […]

]]>