Comments on: Ninth Circuit Says Section 230 Preempts “Defective Design” Claims–Doe v. Grindr https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/02/ninth-circuit-says-section-230-preempts-defective-design-claims-doe-v-grindr.htm Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:27:28 +0000 hourly 1 By: Court Rejects an Attempt to Create a Common-Law Notice-and-Takedown Scheme-Bogard v. TikTok - Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/02/ninth-circuit-says-section-230-preempts-defective-design-claims-doe-v-grindr.htm#comment-4402 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:27:28 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=27398#comment-4402 […] policy could be considered “false” for purposes of Plaintiffs’ claims. [Cites to Doe v. Grindr and Lloyd v. Facebook] The Court is not persuaded that such “not allowed” statements […]

]]> By: Bill Silverstein https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/02/ninth-circuit-says-section-230-preempts-defective-design-claims-doe-v-grindr.htm#comment-4385 Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:00:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=27398#comment-4385 This reminds me a bit of Doe v. SexSearch .com, 502 F. Supp. 2d 719 (N.D. Ohio 2007), judgment summarily aff'd, 551 F.3d 412 (6th Cir. 2008). That was a breach of contract where DOE relied upon the representation that the 15-year-old girl (who lied) was at least 18.

]]>