<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Will Judges Become More Skeptical of Joinder in SAD Scheme Cases?&#8211;Dongguan Juyuan v. Schedule A	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/11/will-judges-become-more-skeptical-of-joinder-in-sad-scheme-cases-dongguan-juyuan-v-schedule-a.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/11/will-judges-become-more-skeptical-of-joinder-in-sad-scheme-cases-dongguan-juyuan-v-schedule-a.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Judge Balks at SAD Scheme Joinder-Xie v. Annex A - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/11/will-judges-become-more-skeptical-of-joinder-in-sad-scheme-cases-dongguan-juyuan-v-schedule-a.htm#comment-4328</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Judge Balks at SAD Scheme Joinder-Xie v. Annex A - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=26997#comment-4328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] so I don&#8217;t have a roster of how many times judges have rejected joinder sua sponte. But I did blog one such case recently (Dongguan Juyuan v. Schedule A), and seeing another judge do the same is encouraging. I hope both judges will continue to hold SAD [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] so I don&#8217;t have a roster of how many times judges have rejected joinder sua sponte. But I did blog one such case recently (Dongguan Juyuan v. Schedule A), and seeing another judge do the same is encouraging. I hope both judges will continue to hold SAD [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
