<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Announcing the Seventh Edition of Advertising &#038; Marketing Law Casebook by Tushnet &#038; Goldman	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/07/announcing-the-seventh-edition-of-advertising-marketing-law-casebook-by-tushnet-goldman.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/07/announcing-the-seventh-edition-of-advertising-marketing-law-casebook-by-tushnet-goldman.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Everything You Wanted to Know About the Moody v. NetChoice Supreme Court Opinion - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/07/announcing-the-seventh-edition-of-advertising-marketing-law-casebook-by-tushnet-goldman.htm#comment-4281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everything You Wanted to Know About the Moody v. NetChoice Supreme Court Opinion - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=26619#comment-4281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The opinion says “The typical newspaper regulates the content and presentation of articles authored by its employees or others, but that same paper might also run nearly all the classified advertisements it receives, regardless of their content and without adding any expression of its own.” Alito slip opinion at 18. This is an afactual hypothetical. Old-school newspapers didn&#8217;t run nearly all of the ads they received. They promulgated and enforced their own house rules for classified advertising. We discuss this in Chapter 17 of our Advertising Law book. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The opinion says “The typical newspaper regulates the content and presentation of articles authored by its employees or others, but that same paper might also run nearly all the classified advertisements it receives, regardless of their content and without adding any expression of its own.” Alito slip opinion at 18. This is an afactual hypothetical. Old-school newspapers didn&#8217;t run nearly all of the ads they received. They promulgated and enforced their own house rules for classified advertising. We discuss this in Chapter 17 of our Advertising Law book. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
