<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Videogame Maker Has Implied License to Depict Copyrighted Tattoos&#8211;Hayden v. 2K	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/04/videogame-maker-has-implied-license-to-depict-copyrighted-tattoos-hayden-v-2k.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/04/videogame-maker-has-implied-license-to-depict-copyrighted-tattoos-hayden-v-2k.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ceren Aytekin		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/04/videogame-maker-has-implied-license-to-depict-copyrighted-tattoos-hayden-v-2k.htm#comment-4248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ceren Aytekin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=26297#comment-4248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for quickly summarizing this important decision; it&#039;s truly fascinating to observe how this issue is addressed from case to case. I believe this interpretation of fair use could significantly influence how cases related to generative AI are resolved, potentially granting more leeway to developers of these models regarding the training data they use. This is especially pertinent in terms of the effect of use on the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. What do you think?

Also, I wanted to mention that a couple of months ago, I wrote an article on this topic. You can read it here: https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/unveiling-the-legal-ink-terplay-of-tattoos-in-video-games-and-movies .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for quickly summarizing this important decision; it&#8217;s truly fascinating to observe how this issue is addressed from case to case. I believe this interpretation of fair use could significantly influence how cases related to generative AI are resolved, potentially granting more leeway to developers of these models regarding the training data they use. This is especially pertinent in terms of the effect of use on the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. What do you think?</p>
<p>Also, I wanted to mention that a couple of months ago, I wrote an article on this topic. You can read it here: <a href="https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/unveiling-the-legal-ink-terplay-of-tattoos-in-video-games-and-movies" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/unveiling-the-legal-ink-terplay-of-tattoos-in-video-games-and-movies</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
