<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Section 230 Applies to Tweeted Links to Defamatory Content&#8211;Coomer v. Donald J. Trump for President	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/04/section-230-applies-to-tweeted-links-to-defamatory-content-coomer-v-donald-j-trump-for-president.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/04/section-230-applies-to-tweeted-links-to-defamatory-content-coomer-v-donald-j-trump-for-president.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Trump&#039;s Retweets Are Criminal Contempt of a Gag Order-People v. Trump - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/04/section-230-applies-to-tweeted-links-to-defamatory-content-coomer-v-donald-j-trump-for-president.htm#comment-4250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trump&#039;s Retweets Are Criminal Contempt of a Gag Order-People v. Trump - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=26277#comment-4250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the analogous verb is on Truth Social). See Banaian v. Bascom and Holmok v. Burke. Trump himself successfully invoked Section 230 in a recent case over tweeting a link to third-party defamatory content, so some members of his [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the analogous verb is on Truth Social). See Banaian v. Bascom and Holmok v. Burke. Trump himself successfully invoked Section 230 in a recent case over tweeting a link to third-party defamatory content, so some members of his [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
