<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Section 230 Doesn&#8217;t Apply to Sending Non-Consensual Pornography by Postal Mail&#8211;Doe v. Spencer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/03/section-230-doesnt-apply-to-sending-non-consensual-pornography-by-postal-mail-doe-v-spencer.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/03/section-230-doesnt-apply-to-sending-non-consensual-pornography-by-postal-mail-doe-v-spencer.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 13:20:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: &#34;Ringless Voicemail&#34; Vendor Wins Section 230 Defense Against FTC-US v. Stratics Networks - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/03/section-230-doesnt-apply-to-sending-non-consensual-pornography-by-postal-mail-doe-v-spencer.htm#comment-4144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#34;Ringless Voicemail&#34; Vendor Wins Section 230 Defense Against FTC-US v. Stratics Networks - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=26161#comment-4144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] was in fact the correct analogy, then I would agree that Section 230 doesn&#8217;t apply, as I just blogged earlier this week. However, the court doesn&#8217;t see it the FTC&#8217;s way: &#8220;It ultimately does not matter [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was in fact the correct analogy, then I would agree that Section 230 doesn&#8217;t apply, as I just blogged earlier this week. However, the court doesn&#8217;t see it the FTC&#8217;s way: &#8220;It ultimately does not matter [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
