Comments on: Hello, You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About Web Scraping Laws (Guest Blog Post, Part 2 of 2) https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/12/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-web-scraping-laws-guest-blog-post-part-2-of-2.htm Sat, 10 Dec 2022 20:16:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: John_Levine https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/12/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-web-scraping-laws-guest-blog-post-part-2-of-2.htm#comment-3498 Sat, 10 Dec 2022 20:16:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=24660#comment-3498 Nice summary. For the Google web scraping stuff, you might want to cite Field vs. Google, 412 F.Supp. 2d 1106 (D. Nev. 2006), where the opinion explicitly noted the ease of opting out as a reason that Google’s scraping and cacheing are OK.

]]> By: As Everyone Expected Years Ago, hiQ's CFAA Wins Don't Mean It Can Freely Scrape-hiQ v. LinkedIn (Guest Blog Post, Part 1 of 2) - Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/12/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-web-scraping-laws-guest-blog-post-part-2-of-2.htm#comment-3496 Fri, 09 Dec 2022 15:14:35 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=24660#comment-3496 […] case. This part explains the most recent ruling, a devastating but not unexpected loss for hiQ. The next part debunks some of the myths that have grown up around the hiQ case during the years of judicial […]

]]>