<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Short Explainer of How California&#8217;s Age-Appropriate Design Code Bill (AB2273) Would Break the Internet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/08/a-short-explainer-of-how-californias-age-appropriate-design-code-bill-ab2273-would-break-the-internet.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/08/a-short-explainer-of-how-californias-age-appropriate-design-code-bill-ab2273-would-break-the-internet.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:38:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: A Short Explainer of Why California&#039;s Social Media Addiction Bill (AB 2408) Is Terrible - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/08/a-short-explainer-of-how-californias-age-appropriate-design-code-bill-ab2273-would-break-the-internet.htm#comment-3339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Short Explainer of Why California&#039;s Social Media Addiction Bill (AB 2408) Is Terrible - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=24246#comment-3339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] three bad California bills that the California legislature is poised to enact. Monday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. Yesterday, I covered AB587, an editorial transparency law. Today, I&#8217;m covering AB 2408, a [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] three bad California bills that the California legislature is poised to enact. Monday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. Yesterday, I covered AB587, an editorial transparency law. Today, I&#8217;m covering AB 2408, a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A Short Explainer of Why California&#039;s Mandatory Transparency Bill (AB 587) Is Terrible - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/08/a-short-explainer-of-how-californias-age-appropriate-design-code-bill-ab2273-would-break-the-internet.htm#comment-3337</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Short Explainer of Why California&#039;s Mandatory Transparency Bill (AB 587) Is Terrible - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 15:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=24246#comment-3337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] three bad California bills that the California legislature is poised to enact. Yesterday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. Today I&#8217;m covering AB587, an editorial transparency law that censors speech both immediately [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] three bad California bills that the California legislature is poised to enact. Yesterday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. Today I&#8217;m covering AB587, an editorial transparency law that censors speech both immediately [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
