Comments on: Will California Eliminate Anonymous Web Browsing? (Comments on CA AB 2273, The Age-Appropriate Design Code Act)

By: James LaBarre

James LaBarre — Fri, 02 Sep 2022 19:42:00 +0000

As I’ve said before, between the losing battle against spammers, scammers, far-leftist politicians and ever increasing restrictions and regulations, the internet will soon be completely unusable. Time to stock up books and anything you need to live an offline life. Which will kind of suck for those of us working 5 hours away from our official “office locations”.

By: Oilygarch

Oilygarch — Wed, 31 Aug 2022 20:31:00 +0000

Aren’t the FAANGs supposed to be keeping an eye out for such garbage, lobbying against it, and fighting it with everything they have?

By: Snapchat Isn't Liable for a Teacher's Sexual Predation-Doe v. Snap - Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:23:27 +0000

[…] Second, if Snapchat can’t monitor the conversation’s substance and intervene when it turns illegal, the only way Snapchat can protect the minor victim in this case is by preventing the minor from having a Snapchat account at all. I know there are many people who support that outcome; indeed, that’s the inevitable effect of California’s proposed Age-Appropriate Design Code. […]

By: California Legislators Seek To Burn Down The Internet — For The Children | Techdirt

Thu, 30 Jun 2022 05:51:43 +0000

[…] posted to Eric Goldman’s Technology & Marketing Law blog. Reposted with […]

By: Thank You California For Keeping Me Permanently Employed | mtanenbaum

Thank You California For Keeping Me Permanently Employed | mtanenbaum — Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:14:40 +0000

[…] Credit: Professor Eric Goldman […]