Comments on: California Courts Continue to Trim Section 230’s Protection for Amazon’s Marketplace (and Everyone Else)–Lee v. Amazon https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/03/california-courts-continue-to-trim-section-230s-protection-for-amazons-marketplace-and-everyone-els-lee-v-amazon.htm Sun, 23 Apr 2023 16:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Forrest Ward https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/03/california-courts-continue-to-trim-section-230s-protection-for-amazons-marketplace-and-everyone-els-lee-v-amazon.htm#comment-3843 Sun, 23 Apr 2023 16:01:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=23666#comment-3843 The problem is that 3rd party sellers who do not create the listing have no ability to edit the listings, but are bound and held liable for the content of those listings by Amazon. This prohibitive action by Amazon maintains a legal trap for small businesses – got to spread those legal fees somehow.

]]> By: ThorsProvoni https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2022/03/california-courts-continue-to-trim-section-230s-protection-for-amazons-marketplace-and-everyone-els-lee-v-amazon.htm#comment-3204 Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:51:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=23666#comment-3204 In Martillo v. Twitter I continue my lawfare against the logical fallacy and Constitutional violation of section 230 caselaw.

Here’s Twitter’s Appellee’s Brief.

Here’s my Reply Brief.

I provided Notice of a few typos.

I await an Appellee’s Brief from Medium. I will enjoy Oral Arguments. It will be my first time to make an oral argument outside the USPTO. I love to argue and to reduce an opposing party to a quivering mass of protoplasm.

]]>