One should be able to access all the filings in the District Court proceeding (1:21-cv-11119-RGS) and in the Court of Appeals (21-1921) proceeding via Pacer. I have also filed the documents submitted to SCOTUS (21-6916) in CM/ECF for the Court of Appeals because the Appellate and SCOTUS proceedings are parallel. It is helpful to me and probably to Defendants/Defendant-Appellees/Respondents if all the documents can be found in more or less one place. Because I am not an attorney, I am not allowed to use SCOTUS’ electronic filing system.

In order directly to challenge CDA caselaw, not only did I follow the blueprint that Justice Thomas presented in Malwarebytes, Inc. v. Enigma Software Grp. U.S., 141 S. Ct. 13, 208 L. Ed. 2d 197 (2020), but I also explicitly pointed out the logical fallacy in the reasoning of Zeran v. America Online, 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997). I presented the following questions to SCOTUS.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6dbc4c40f72c66e7dc19c4c3aca2967b0e6bef073f74f7b9f767a6e8fe0e5f31.png

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/382aa752318677ea552d4d8c2c5bec582b378fd483b18d4e4fda17233a7b1437.png

Meanwhile, back in the Court of Appeals, I overcame Twitter’s effort to dismiss the case.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7c021890d42aa4103cde9935aa2edd0d50de4d1136fc4e96f6636fdb52651965.png