<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trump Has to Litigate His Must-Carry Lawsuit in YouTube&#8217;s Home Court&#8211;Trump v. YouTube	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 23:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rupert Bridewell		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm#comment-3125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rupert Bridewell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=23142#comment-3125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm#comment-3124&quot;&gt;Eric Goldman&lt;/a&gt;.

Opinions can differ as to whether this was a &lt;i&gt;coup&lt;/i&gt; attempt, any more than Stacy Abrams&#039; continued claims to be the duly elected governor of Georgia or Hillary Clinton&#039;s now debunked (but still repeated) theory that the Russians elected Donald Trump.  I think voters are beginning to see that this is about more than one orange-haired blowhard politician who drives a lot of people crazy.  Indeed, the shutting down of a politician on Facebook or Twitter may be just fine for many as long as it&#039;s the Donald, but the law teaches us that what goes around comes around.  Imagine if this technology existed in the 1960s and suddenly MLK and Robert Kennedy were banned, and pro-civil rights posts were either shadow-banned or imprinted with a warning?  This four-year interregnum between Trump and the next Republican President (it&#039;s hard to see a Democrat winning in the wake of the last nine months) will, if nothing else, allow this realization to sink in and then turn up in voting behavior in 2022 and 2024.  We live in interesting times.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm#comment-3124">Eric Goldman</a>.</p>
<p>Opinions can differ as to whether this was a <i>coup</i> attempt, any more than Stacy Abrams&#8217; continued claims to be the duly elected governor of Georgia or Hillary Clinton&#8217;s now debunked (but still repeated) theory that the Russians elected Donald Trump.  I think voters are beginning to see that this is about more than one orange-haired blowhard politician who drives a lot of people crazy.  Indeed, the shutting down of a politician on Facebook or Twitter may be just fine for many as long as it&#8217;s the Donald, but the law teaches us that what goes around comes around.  Imagine if this technology existed in the 1960s and suddenly MLK and Robert Kennedy were banned, and pro-civil rights posts were either shadow-banned or imprinted with a warning?  This four-year interregnum between Trump and the next Republican President (it&#8217;s hard to see a Democrat winning in the wake of the last nine months) will, if nothing else, allow this realization to sink in and then turn up in voting behavior in 2022 and 2024.  We live in interesting times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Goldman		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm#comment-3124</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Goldman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=23142#comment-3124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm#comment-3123&quot;&gt;Rupert Bridewell&lt;/a&gt;.

IMO the systemic efforts by the Republican party to normalize Trump&#039;s failed coup attempt will have far stronger consequences on Trump&#039;s efforts to &quot;return to power&quot; than anything that happens in this lawsuit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm#comment-3123">Rupert Bridewell</a>.</p>
<p>IMO the systemic efforts by the Republican party to normalize Trump&#8217;s failed coup attempt will have far stronger consequences on Trump&#8217;s efforts to &#8220;return to power&#8221; than anything that happens in this lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rupert Bridewell		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/trump-has-to-litigate-his-must-carry-lawsuit-in-youtubes-home-court-trump-v-youtube.htm#comment-3123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rupert Bridewell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=23142#comment-3123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Given recent decisions of the Florida federal courts, I&#039;d much rather be in the Northern District of California if I were Trump.  However the federal court ultimately rules, I am hopeful that we are rapidly approaching a critical mass in which direct or oblique content control by social media companies (involving things falling short of having a public safety component) will deprive them of immunity, or at least curtail it.  It&#039;s just one of a number of areas where the destructive powers of social media companies need to drive the creation of new legal paradigms.  One part of this process, hopefully, will be robust depositions of everyone at Twitter surrounding the decision to ban Trump.  If they tell the truth, I suspect the testimony will be alarming to all -- presuming they can set aside their unbridled hatred of Mr. Trump.  That he&#039;s now out of office, perhaps temperatures can cool.  If not not, we may unwittingly be paving the way for his return to power in 2024.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given recent decisions of the Florida federal courts, I&#8217;d much rather be in the Northern District of California if I were Trump.  However the federal court ultimately rules, I am hopeful that we are rapidly approaching a critical mass in which direct or oblique content control by social media companies (involving things falling short of having a public safety component) will deprive them of immunity, or at least curtail it.  It&#8217;s just one of a number of areas where the destructive powers of social media companies need to drive the creation of new legal paradigms.  One part of this process, hopefully, will be robust depositions of everyone at Twitter surrounding the decision to ban Trump.  If they tell the truth, I suspect the testimony will be alarming to all &#8212; presuming they can set aside their unbridled hatred of Mr. Trump.  That he&#8217;s now out of office, perhaps temperatures can cool.  If not not, we may unwittingly be paving the way for his return to power in 2024.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
