<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Court Orders Unmasking Subpoena of Alleged Infringers&#8211;Baugher v. GoDaddy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/court-orders-unmasking-subpoena-of-alleged-infringers-baugher-v-godaddy.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/court-orders-unmasking-subpoena-of-alleged-infringers-baugher-v-godaddy.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 17:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gordon Firemark		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/court-orders-unmasking-subpoena-of-alleged-infringers-baugher-v-godaddy.htm#comment-3147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Firemark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=23211#comment-3147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eric, you say:
&quot;The DMCA says the subpoenaed information may be used only for copyright enforcement purposes, but there’s no practical way to enforce this, and I can’t think of anyone who has tried. Nevertheless, the court says the statutory limitation is good enough to address the bloggers’ fears of misuse, so the subpoena must be honored.&quot;

Here&#039;s my thought... might the Court issuing the unmasking subpoena have power to hold a misuser of the identity information (such as to get alleged infringer fired)  in contempt?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, you say:<br />
&#8220;The DMCA says the subpoenaed information may be used only for copyright enforcement purposes, but there’s no practical way to enforce this, and I can’t think of anyone who has tried. Nevertheless, the court says the statutory limitation is good enough to address the bloggers’ fears of misuse, so the subpoena must be honored.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my thought&#8230; might the Court issuing the unmasking subpoena have power to hold a misuser of the identity information (such as to get alleged infringer fired)  in contempt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
