<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Eighth Circuit Embraces the Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine. What??? UGH. No. Why???&#8211;Select Comfort v. Baxter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/05/eighth-circuit-embraces-the-initial-interest-confusion-doctrine-what-ugh-no-why-select-comfort-v-baxter.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/05/eighth-circuit-embraces-the-initial-interest-confusion-doctrine-what-ugh-no-why-select-comfort-v-baxter.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 15:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 8th Cir Wakes Initial Interest Confusion: Select Comfort v John Baxter re SLEEP NUMBER and NUMBER BED &#124; The Trademark Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/05/eighth-circuit-embraces-the-initial-interest-confusion-doctrine-what-ugh-no-why-select-comfort-v-baxter.htm#comment-2987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8th Cir Wakes Initial Interest Confusion: Select Comfort v John Baxter re SLEEP NUMBER and NUMBER BED &#124; The Trademark Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 15:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22604#comment-2987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Prof Goldman is not happy with this decision. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Prof Goldman is not happy with this decision. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yvette Joy Liebesman		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/05/eighth-circuit-embraces-the-initial-interest-confusion-doctrine-what-ugh-no-why-select-comfort-v-baxter.htm#comment-2984</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yvette Joy Liebesman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22604#comment-2984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not really shocking-- this is the same circuit that doesn&#039;t use the Rogers Test, but instead has its own “adequate alternative avenues of communication” test from &lt;i&gt;Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. v. Novak.&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really shocking&#8211; this is the same circuit that doesn&#8217;t use the Rogers Test, but instead has its own “adequate alternative avenues of communication” test from <i>Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. v. Novak.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
