https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/03/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-alleged-shadowbanning-de-souza-millan-v-facebook.htm Sun, 01 Aug 2021 07:10:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/03/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-alleged-shadowbanning-de-souza-millan-v-facebook.htm#comment-3059 Sun, 01 Aug 2021 07:10:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22479#comment-3059 The courts do what they want with out regard to what is legal or written in the books. Lots of things are incorrect the plaintiff argued that the civil rights act of 1964 states service in their. Based on the English dictionary the courts did what they want and not follow factual law. Also I wrote in there that facebook does not qualify for CDA 230 it clear states private blocking , meaning this statue is for a private company , or private ISP , not a public ISP. I also wrote that common carriers definition , the courts over looked everything I wrote , the courts are corrupted lier. A good example of the need for CDA 230 is a private company hides content from a employer, like pornography, so another employer does not walk by , and alleges sexual harassments. Or the Employee trying to access pornography in the job does not sue over first amendment, of freedom of exchange ideas. The courts are criminal gangster doing what they want in the interest of special interest groups, to traffic people for their interest. Facebook has pornography on there web site and I clearly wrote that even if they had CDA 230 they don’t qualify for it , you can’t qualify for a immunity when your breaking the reason of the immunity , like trafficking or sexual content. The criminals judges courts are not following factual law. 4 Judges , and I had one in 2018 that can’t allow me to have a fair court , in 2018 Judge Burton , a criminal Judge did not allow me to show my evidence against the criminals in the FBI. When your Jewish your untouchably in the U.S. you comment any crime you want and get always with it. ZukerBurg is Jewish so he does what he wants.

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/03/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-alleged-shadowbanning-de-souza-millan-v-facebook.htm#comment-3058 Sun, 01 Aug 2021 07:01:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22479#comment-3058 Also if any lawyer ever read the Civil Rights act , it is not a minority statue, anybody can use it ,or does it state minority only in their , it is a statue of fair and equal service for all. Under what is document in the 1964 act , a White Person can also use it . Why don’t you lawyers and your criminal Judges follow what is written , imagine if everybody what fixed a aircraft did what they interpret and not what they read. I don’t get why reading is so difficult even doe I did go into pre-med but never finished over financial reasons , but had to walk away with a A . Medical Books are the most complix.

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/03/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-alleged-shadowbanning-de-souza-millan-v-facebook.htm#comment-3055 Sun, 01 Aug 2021 06:33:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22479#comment-3055 The courts do what they want with out regard to what is legal or written in the books. Lots of things are incorrect the plaintiff argued that the civil rights act of 1964 states service in their. Based on the English dictionary the courts did what they want and not follow factual law. Also I wrote in there that facebook does not qualify for CDA 230 it clear states private blocking , meaning this statue is for a private company , or private ISP , not a public ISP. I also wrote that common carriers definition , the courts over looked everything I wrote , the courts are corrupted lier. A good example of the need for CDA 230 is a private company hides content from a employer, like pornography, so another employer does not walk by , and alleges sexual harassments. Or the Employee trying to access pornography in the job does not sue over first amendment, of freedom of exchange ideas. The courts are criminal gangster doing what they want in the interest of special interest groups, to traffic people for their interest. Facebook has pornography on there web site and I clearly wrote that even if they had CDA 230 they don’t qualify for it , you can’t qualify for a immunity when your breaking the reason of the immunity , like trafficking or sexual content. The criminals judges courts are not following factual law. 4 Judges , and I had one in 2018 that can’t allow me to have a fair court , in 2018 Judge Burton , a criminal Judge did not allow me to show my evidence against the criminals in the FBI. When your Jewish your untouchably in the U.S. you comment any crime you want and get always with it. ZukerBurg is Jewish so he does what he wants.

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/03/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-alleged-shadowbanning-de-souza-millan-v-facebook.htm#comment-2960 Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:20:06 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22479#comment-2960 […] of the #MAGA genre. YouTube removed some videos, allegedly “shadowbanned” him (again, I raise questions whether that’s the appropriate term here), and allegedly kept money it should have paid to him. (This looks like a situation where YouTube […]

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/03/facebook-defeats-lawsuit-over-alleged-shadowbanning-de-souza-millan-v-facebook.htm#comment-2959 Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:05:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22479#comment-2959 “This is the kind of lawsuit we can expect to see regularly when Congress
creates more bases for plaintiffs to sue over content moderation
decisions.” Painfully true, and they won’t be pro se, either. It’s going to be a gold rush for lawyers. It won’t last long, because Facebook et al. will quickly take draconian measures to reduce their exposure, but it will be a feeding frenzy while it lasts. Ugh.

]]>