Also, you missed the fact that I appeal the case to the Ninth Circuit Federal Court as “9th Cir. Case No. 21-15234”. Below is the list of valid points, which I brought up and the Defendant failed to answer.

1. Attacking US Customers in US soil on behalf of the enemies of the United States is fundamentally wrong and dangerous to all Americans.
2. Anti-SLAPP Laws changed in 01JAN2015 and supersede prior laws.
3. Appellee quoted the obsolete version of Anti-SLAPP Laws and obsolete cases to attack Appellant’s 01JAN2015 Anti-SLAPP Claims.
4. “Motions to Dismiss” does not equal “Motion to Strike”.
5. Appellee filed the wrong motion citing “Anti-SLAPP are Motions to Strike” false logic. The Appellant’s claims are still alive.
6. The multiple motions in CAND District Court Docket valid the Appellant’s logic of “Anti-SLAPP Law Armory” with multiple declarations and findings.
7. This Case is a “Matter of 1st Impression” regarding 01JAN2015 Anti-SLAPP Summary Judgement with a real Public Issue of a Global Pandemic.
8. The 01JAN2015 Anti-SLAPP “Language of the Law” and mandate of “Construe Broadly” are above the Appellee’s obsolete misinterpretations and false limits.
9. The District Court Judge ignored obvious facts, the 01JAN2015 Anti-SLAPP laws, and “Clear and Present Danger” legal theory.
10. IIED – Intentional censoring of US military communities to help the enemies of the United States to facilitate a global pandemic does exceed all bounds tolerated by a civilized society.
11. Appellant is willing to relocate to California to reduce any possible financial burden on the State of California from reliefs and focus the California Judges on justice rather than monetary resources.

BTW, did you know that it took months for the LinkedIn (The Defendant) to provide a Answer Brief (which we duplicated by accident LOL!) and did not even address a single point that I mentioned? I mean. They just recycled the same arguments from their CACD Motion to Dismiss in an Appeal Court without addressing a single topic of mine. Nothing about using Obsolete Case nor about quoting Obsolete Case Law. Read it yourself and above all, ….give me a call next time you write an article. At least try like a real journalist.

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/21-15234