Comments on: Google Isn’t Liable for Allegedly Problematic Search Results–Diez v. Google https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/12/google-isnt-liable-for-allegedly-problematic-search-results-diez-v-google.htm Sat, 26 Dec 2020 17:53:46 +0000 hourly 1 By: News of the Week; December 23, 2020 – Communications Law at Allard Hall https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/12/google-isnt-liable-for-allegedly-problematic-search-results-diez-v-google.htm#comment-2866 Sat, 26 Dec 2020 17:53:46 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22056#comment-2866 […] Google Isn’t Liable for Allegedly Problematic Search Results–Diez v. Google (Eric Goldman) […]

]]> By: Ben Franklin https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/12/google-isnt-liable-for-allegedly-problematic-search-results-diez-v-google.htm#comment-2862 Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:59:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=22056#comment-2862 [Furthermore, if you think this is a Section 230 problem, then you probably can explain what, exactly, you want any image search function like Google’s to do differently here.]

I want Google to take all reasonable steps, including AI screening of images, to filter these images from its results. It can be done. It is being done by others and by Google for some purposes. Since Google never appeared here, we don’t know why or how these images appeared on Google and whether they got past any filters, but we do know Pinterest caught them.

[Finally, it hasn’t been confirmed that the Pinterest-posted image was actually CSAM.]

So how was Diaz prosecuted?

]]>