<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Snapchat Isn&#8217;t Liable for Its Speed Filter (Even if Section 230 Doesn&#8217;t Apply)&#8211;Maynard v. Snapchat	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/10/snapchat-isnt-liable-for-its-speed-filter-even-if-section-230-doesnt-apply-maynard-v-snapchat.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/10/snapchat-isnt-liable-for-its-speed-filter-even-if-section-230-doesnt-apply-maynard-v-snapchat.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: News of the Week; November 4, 2020 &#8211; Communications Law at Allard Hall		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/10/snapchat-isnt-liable-for-its-speed-filter-even-if-section-230-doesnt-apply-maynard-v-snapchat.htm#comment-2796</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News of the Week; November 4, 2020 &#8211; Communications Law at Allard Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=21908#comment-2796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Snapchat Isn’t Liable for Its Speed Filter (Even if Section 230 Doesn’t Apply)–Maynard v. Snap&#8230; (Eric Goldman) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Snapchat Isn’t Liable for Its Speed Filter (Even if Section 230 Doesn’t Apply)–Maynard v. Snap&#8230; (Eric Goldman) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
