<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Section 230 Protects Craigslist from Sex Trafficking Claims, Despite FOSTA&#8211;JB v. Craigslist	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/08/section-230-protects-craigslist-from-sex-trafficking-claims-despite-fosta-jb-v-craigslist.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/08/section-230-protects-craigslist-from-sex-trafficking-claims-despite-fosta-jb-v-craigslist.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Section 230 Preempts Another FOSTA Claim-Doe v. Kik - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/08/section-230-protects-craigslist-from-sex-trafficking-claims-despite-fosta-jb-v-craigslist.htm#comment-2718</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Section 230 Preempts Another FOSTA Claim-Doe v. Kik - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=21625#comment-2718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ruling addresses the same ground as the recent (and uncited) JB v. Craigslist ruling. That case also dealt with the 1591/1595 &#8220;participation in a venture&#8221; scienter [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ruling addresses the same ground as the recent (and uncited) JB v. Craigslist ruling. That case also dealt with the 1591/1595 &#8220;participation in a venture&#8221; scienter [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: News of the Week; August 26, 2020 &#8211; Communications Law at Allard Hall		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/08/section-230-protects-craigslist-from-sex-trafficking-claims-despite-fosta-jb-v-craigslist.htm#comment-2713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News of the Week; August 26, 2020 &#8211; Communications Law at Allard Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2020 06:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=21625#comment-2713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Section 230 Protects Craigslist from Sex Trafficking Claims, Despite FOSTA–JB v. Craigslist (Eric Goldman) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Section 230 Protects Craigslist from Sex Trafficking Claims, Despite FOSTA–JB v. Craigslist (Eric Goldman) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
