<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Court Sends Google Assistant Privacy Lawsuit Back for a Redo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/05/court-sends-google-assistant-privacy-lawsuit-back-for-a-redo.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/05/court-sends-google-assistant-privacy-lawsuit-back-for-a-redo.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CLIP-ings: May 22, 2020 &#8211; CLIP-ings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/05/court-sends-google-assistant-privacy-lawsuit-back-for-a-redo.htm#comment-2585</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CLIP-ings: May 22, 2020 &#8211; CLIP-ings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=21150#comment-2585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] California District Court Signals Support For Privacy Claims In Suit Involving Google Assistant: Although it granted Google’s motion to dismiss in a recent class action alleging that the company’s voice-activated assistant tool actively listened to and recorded conversations after misperceiving voice commands, a California federal district court permitted the plaintiffs to amend their complaint, and suggested plaintiffs may have an expectation of privacy when using the device in settings &#8220;reasonably understood to be private.&#8221; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] California District Court Signals Support For Privacy Claims In Suit Involving Google Assistant: Although it granted Google’s motion to dismiss in a recent class action alleging that the company’s voice-activated assistant tool actively listened to and recorded conversations after misperceiving voice commands, a California federal district court permitted the plaintiffs to amend their complaint, and suggested plaintiffs may have an expectation of privacy when using the device in settings &#8220;reasonably understood to be private.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
