<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Videogame Doesn&#8217;t Infringe Tattoo Copyright By Depicting Basketball Players&#8211;Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/03/videogame-doesnt-infringe-tattoo-copyright-by-depicting-basketball-players-solid-oak-sketches-v-2k-games.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/03/videogame-doesnt-infringe-tattoo-copyright-by-depicting-basketball-players-solid-oak-sketches-v-2k-games.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Humvee Can&#039;t Stop Depictions of Its Vehicles in the &#039;Call of Duty&#039; Videogame-AM General v. Activision Blizzard - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/03/videogame-doesnt-infringe-tattoo-copyright-by-depicting-basketball-players-solid-oak-sketches-v-2k-games.htm#comment-2567</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Humvee Can&#039;t Stop Depictions of Its Vehicles in the &#039;Call of Duty&#039; Videogame-AM General v. Activision Blizzard - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20979#comment-2567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#038; Marketing Law blog. This is my third videogame IP blog post this week. See my prior posts on tattoo copyrights and signature moves. All three rulings are decisive defense wins, a sign of how bogus videogame [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &amp; Marketing Law blog. This is my third videogame IP blog post this week. See my prior posts on tattoo copyrights and signature moves. All three rulings are decisive defense wins, a sign of how bogus videogame [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Videogame Can Replicate Musician&#039;s &#34;Signature Move&#34; (Unless It&#039;s a False Endorsement, Which It Isn&#039;t)-Pellegrino v. Epic Games - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2020/03/videogame-doesnt-infringe-tattoo-copyright-by-depicting-basketball-players-solid-oak-sketches-v-2k-games.htm#comment-2555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Videogame Can Replicate Musician&#039;s &#34;Signature Move&#34; (Unless It&#039;s a False Endorsement, Which It Isn&#039;t)-Pellegrino v. Epic Games - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20979#comment-2555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] case is a nice companion to my blog post yesterday on tattoo copyrights in videogames. Both cases involve weaponization of IP to prevent videogames from depicting real life. I expect [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case is a nice companion to my blog post yesterday on tattoo copyrights in videogames. Both cases involve weaponization of IP to prevent videogames from depicting real life. I expect [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
