https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/11/more-evidence-that-print-on-demand-vendors-may-be-doomed-greg-young-publishing-v-zazzle.htm Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:06:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/11/more-evidence-that-print-on-demand-vendors-may-be-doomed-greg-young-publishing-v-zazzle.htm#comment-2447 Wed, 04 Dec 2019 02:28:10 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20624#comment-2447 […] More Evidence That Print-on-Demand Vendors May Be Doomed–Greg Young Publishing v. Zazzle (Eric Goldman) […]

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/11/more-evidence-that-print-on-demand-vendors-may-be-doomed-greg-young-publishing-v-zazzle.htm#comment-2444 Sun, 01 Dec 2019 16:49:35 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20624#comment-2444 […] novel outcome. This reasoning could then apply to other print-on-demand publishers, such as the Greg Young v. Zazzle case that reached a very different outcome. I don’t expect it […]

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/11/more-evidence-that-print-on-demand-vendors-may-be-doomed-greg-young-publishing-v-zazzle.htm#comment-2443 Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:01:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20624#comment-2443 Why should the law be such that it would protect a business model that you recognize is unprofitable without the ability to infringe other’s rights with impunity? It’s a cop out to say go after the users, the users have no ability to satisfy a judgment, and they’re not the ones who created the business or are reaping the bulk of the profits. No, it’s better to place the liability on Zazzle, placing an incentive to police this business in the same hands that have the resources and ability to do so.

]]>