<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Internet Access Provider May Be Vicariously Liable for Subscribers&#8217; BitTorrent Downloads&#8211;Warner Bros. v. Charter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/10/internet-access-provider-may-be-vicariously-liable-for-subscribers-bittorrent-downloads-warner-bros-v-charter.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/10/internet-access-provider-may-be-vicariously-liable-for-subscribers-bittorrent-downloads-warner-bros-v-charter.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 22:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Strike 3&#039;s Copyright Litigation Campaign Completely Strikes Out - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/10/internet-access-provider-may-be-vicariously-liable-for-subscribers-bittorrent-downloads-warner-bros-v-charter.htm#comment-2437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strike 3&#039;s Copyright Litigation Campaign Completely Strikes Out - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20551#comment-2437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The court says that Strike 3 can (but doesn&#8217;t) send takedown notices to IAPs for infringing subscribers, and it could sue the IAPs if they fail to terminate repeat infringers. While that&#8217;s true, I don&#8217;t love this alternative. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The court says that Strike 3 can (but doesn&#8217;t) send takedown notices to IAPs for infringing subscribers, and it could sue the IAPs if they fail to terminate repeat infringers. While that&#8217;s true, I don&#8217;t love this alternative. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Internet Access Provider May Be Vicariously Liable for Subscribers&#8217; BitTorrent Downloads &#8211; RightsTech Project		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/10/internet-access-provider-may-be-vicariously-liable-for-subscribers-bittorrent-downloads-warner-bros-v-charter.htm#comment-2434</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Access Provider May Be Vicariously Liable for Subscribers&#8217; BitTorrent Downloads &#8211; RightsTech Project]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20551#comment-2434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Source: Internet Access Provider May Be Vicariously Liable for Subscribers&#8217; BitTorrent Downloads-Warne&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Source: Internet Access Provider May Be Vicariously Liable for Subscribers&#8217; BitTorrent Downloads-Warne&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
