<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Reminder: The Copyright Office Will Be Yanking Eligibility for the DMCA Online Safe Harbor (Again)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/09/reminder-the-copyright-office-will-be-yanking-eligibility-for-the-dmca-online-safe-harbor-again.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/09/reminder-the-copyright-office-will-be-yanking-eligibility-for-the-dmca-online-safe-harbor-again.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 19:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: apathy		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/09/reminder-the-copyright-office-will-be-yanking-eligibility-for-the-dmca-online-safe-harbor-again.htm#comment-2370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20382#comment-2370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is some good info on the Copyright.gov FAQ page that clarifies the amendment/renewal process, and what actions reset that 3 year period of registration. Regarding the amount of Designations that lapsed on the rollout of the new system – when I worked with the old system years ago to register designations for my workplace, I noticed the way people filed was all over the place, a bit of a mess, with lots of junk in there. (The old directory is still up, filled with pdfs, many filled out by hand).  I think people registered things needlessly -- such as sub-domains and redirects – and were likely going with the, Let’s just register everything in sight just in case, approach. On the new system, I manage a handful of Service Providers and several hundred designations for my company and I find it pretty smooth and easy. It’s also cheaper – the old filing fees could get expensive, depending how frequently one had to submit new urls.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some good info on the Copyright.gov FAQ page that clarifies the amendment/renewal process, and what actions reset that 3 year period of registration. Regarding the amount of Designations that lapsed on the rollout of the new system – when I worked with the old system years ago to register designations for my workplace, I noticed the way people filed was all over the place, a bit of a mess, with lots of junk in there. (The old directory is still up, filled with pdfs, many filled out by hand).  I think people registered things needlessly &#8212; such as sub-domains and redirects – and were likely going with the, Let’s just register everything in sight just in case, approach. On the new system, I manage a handful of Service Providers and several hundred designations for my company and I find it pretty smooth and easy. It’s also cheaper – the old filing fees could get expensive, depending how frequently one had to submit new urls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
