<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Comments on Sen. Hawley&#8217;s &#8220;[Ending] Support for Internet Censorship Act&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/comments-on-sen-hawleys-ending-support-for-internet-censorship-act.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/comments-on-sen-hawleys-ending-support-for-internet-censorship-act.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 01:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jdgalt		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/comments-on-sen-hawleys-ending-support-for-internet-censorship-act.htm#comment-2355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdgalt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20206#comment-2355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A good analysis from the legal end of things.


From the practical end I would point out that this controversy is already causing the creation of lots of new forums with different moderation policies than those such as Facebook and Youtube that triggered the public outrage behind this bill.  Gab, Bitchute, and Parler are all new, while existing services such as Pornhub now host content unrelated to their original missions.


But there still is bad news -- several attempts have been made to get essential services such as domain name service denied to dissident platforms, while banking services that many online performers need to stay in business (PayPal, kickstarter, Patreon and their competitors, but also Mastercard and Chase) have started refusing service based on politics.  Services in both those categories are regulated so heavily that creating competition with them won&#039;t always be practical (especially if the UN gets the idea to use its control of ICANN to deny registration to dissident sites), and it&#039;s not that long ago that the US government tried to deny banking to a long list of legal businesses through Operation Choke Point.  So a law guaranteeing everyone the right to banking access and domain name service without viewpoint discrimination is necessary before the next Democratic administration can get in and try again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good analysis from the legal end of things.</p>
<p>From the practical end I would point out that this controversy is already causing the creation of lots of new forums with different moderation policies than those such as Facebook and Youtube that triggered the public outrage behind this bill.  Gab, Bitchute, and Parler are all new, while existing services such as Pornhub now host content unrelated to their original missions.</p>
<p>But there still is bad news &#8212; several attempts have been made to get essential services such as domain name service denied to dissident platforms, while banking services that many online performers need to stay in business (PayPal, kickstarter, Patreon and their competitors, but also Mastercard and Chase) have started refusing service based on politics.  Services in both those categories are regulated so heavily that creating competition with them won&#8217;t always be practical (especially if the UN gets the idea to use its control of ICANN to deny registration to dissident sites), and it&#8217;s not that long ago that the US government tried to deny banking to a long list of legal businesses through Operation Choke Point.  So a law guaranteeing everyone the right to banking access and domain name service without viewpoint discrimination is necessary before the next Democratic administration can get in and try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Russia Fucked With American Democracy, But It Can&#039;t Fuck With Section 230-Federal Agency of News v. Facebook - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/comments-on-sen-hawleys-ending-support-for-internet-censorship-act.htm#comment-2339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russia Fucked With American Democracy, But It Can&#039;t Fuck With Section 230-Federal Agency of News v. Facebook - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20206#comment-2339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] particular, this case reiterates the depravity of Sen. Hawley&#8217;s “[Ending] Support for Internet Censorship Act.” FAN was promoting its own political viewpoints, so Sen. Hawley&#8217;s proposal would force [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] particular, this case reiterates the depravity of Sen. Hawley&#8217;s “[Ending] Support for Internet Censorship Act.” FAN was promoting its own political viewpoints, so Sen. Hawley&#8217;s proposal would force [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Large and Diverse Coalition Issues a Statement of Principles to Help Evaluate UGC Liability Reform Proposals - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/comments-on-sen-hawleys-ending-support-for-internet-censorship-act.htm#comment-2332</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Large and Diverse Coalition Issues a Statement of Principles to Help Evaluate UGC Liability Reform Proposals - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20206#comment-2332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I posted a 2,300 word takedown of Sen. Hawley&#8217;s anti-Section 230 bill. That post took me at least 6 hours of drafting time, and 3 weeks of chronological time, to [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I posted a 2,300 word takedown of Sen. Hawley&#8217;s anti-Section 230 bill. That post took me at least 6 hours of drafting time, and 3 weeks of chronological time, to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben Franklin		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/comments-on-sen-hawleys-ending-support-for-internet-censorship-act.htm#comment-2331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Franklin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20206#comment-2331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting that the Republican Party of today is the ACLU of the &#039;70s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that the Republican Party of today is the ACLU of the &#8217;70s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
