<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Amazon Might Be Liable for Defective Marketplace Items (But Only When It Tries to Warn Consumers)&#8211;Fox v. Amazon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/amazon-might-be-liable-for-defective-marketplace-items-but-only-when-it-tries-to-warn-consumers-fox-v-amazon.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/amazon-might-be-liable-for-defective-marketplace-items-but-only-when-it-tries-to-warn-consumers-fox-v-amazon.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 18:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Amazon May Be Liable for Marketplace Items-Oberdorf v. Amazon - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/07/amazon-might-be-liable-for-defective-marketplace-items-but-only-when-it-tries-to-warn-consumers-fox-v-amazon.htm#comment-2326</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amazon May Be Liable for Marketplace Items-Oberdorf v. Amazon - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 18:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20146#comment-2326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ruling for Amazon, but who else will it affect? I have no idea. First, the court distinguishes Fox v. Amazon (a 6th Circuit ruling saying Amazon wasn&#8217;t the seller) because the applicable Tennessee [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ruling for Amazon, but who else will it affect? I have no idea. First, the court distinguishes Fox v. Amazon (a 6th Circuit ruling saying Amazon wasn&#8217;t the seller) because the applicable Tennessee [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
