https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/06/twitter-gets-another-significant-section-230-win-in-lawsuit-by-suspended-user-murphy-v-twitter.htm Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:43:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/06/twitter-gets-another-significant-section-230-win-in-lawsuit-by-suspended-user-murphy-v-twitter.htm#comment-2314 Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:52:50 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20102#comment-2314 […] removing/blocking/downgrading user content. This is my third such post in the last 9 days (see also Murphy v. Twitter and Brittain v. Twitter). The lawsuits and court rulings are basically all the same. Primarily due […]

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/06/twitter-gets-another-significant-section-230-win-in-lawsuit-by-suspended-user-murphy-v-twitter.htm#comment-2312 Sat, 15 Jun 2019 22:50:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20102#comment-2312 Reason no. 5,287 why social media platforms AKA big tech needs to have its protections found in section 230 revoked. It wants to play both sides–be a platform when it comes to protection from litigation (as in Murphy) but operates as a publisher by unilaterally suspending accounts of those users who have opinions it decrees are not correct.

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/06/twitter-gets-another-significant-section-230-win-in-lawsuit-by-suspended-user-murphy-v-twitter.htm#comment-2310 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 22:03:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20102#comment-2310 Excellent report, though I don’t think “schizophrenic” means what you think it means

]]>