<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Section 230 Protects Facebook&#8217;s Account and Content Restriction Decisions&#8211;Ebeid v. Facebook	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/section-230-protects-facebooks-account-and-content-restriction-decisions-ebeid-v-facebook.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/section-230-protects-facebooks-account-and-content-restriction-decisions-ebeid-v-facebook.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 14:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: A Recap of My Recent Section 230 Papers - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/section-230-protects-facebooks-account-and-content-restriction-decisions-ebeid-v-facebook.htm#comment-2299</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Recap of My Recent Section 230 Papers - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 14:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20007#comment-2299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] * Online User Account Termination and 47 U.S.C. §230(c)(2) (2012). A topic that has heated up a lot in the past 7 years, but Section 230(c)(1) has stolen the spotlight. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] * Online User Account Termination and 47 U.S.C. §230(c)(2) (2012). A topic that has heated up a lot in the past 7 years, but Section 230(c)(1) has stolen the spotlight. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
