Comments on: Ninth Circuit Chunks Another Section 230 Ruling—HomeAway v. Santa Monica (Catch-up Post) https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/ninth-circuit-chunks-another-section-230-ruling-homeaway-v-santa-monica-catch-up-post.htm Wed, 08 May 2019 16:21:49 +0000 hourly 1 By: Airbnb Gets Mixed Results in Challenge to Boston's Anti-Airbnb Law-Airbnb v. Boston - Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/ninth-circuit-chunks-another-section-230-ruling-homeaway-v-santa-monica-catch-up-post.htm#comment-2294 Wed, 08 May 2019 16:21:49 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19943#comment-2294 […] Airbnb’s San Francisco (one of my top 10 Section 230 cases of all time) and Santa Monica decisions, the court says Section 230 does not preempt the penalties provision, […]

]]> By: Wisconsin Supreme Court Fixes a Bad Section 230 Opinion—Daniel v. Armslist - Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/ninth-circuit-chunks-another-section-230-ruling-homeaway-v-santa-monica-catch-up-post.htm#comment-2292 Tue, 07 May 2019 13:10:29 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19943#comment-2292 […] the HomeAway v. Santa Monica ruling, it’s not clear if Armslist would get the same Section 230 dismissal if it were structured as […]

]]> By: David S. Gingras https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/ninth-circuit-chunks-another-section-230-ruling-homeaway-v-santa-monica-catch-up-post.htm#comment-2291 Thu, 02 May 2019 21:47:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19943#comment-2291 OK, I actually have TONS of comments about this case, a few of which may even be worth sharing, but since Disqus thinks I am a spambot and thus blocks all of my comments, let me post this short test first. If it works, I’ll come back with some longer points trying to explain why this ruling (despite some awkward language) wasn’t really wrong. TESTING. TESTING. 1-2-3 — Disqus, am I getting through?

]]>